@article{Hoek-Evers-Vermeul-etal-2019.201,
 abstract = {The Cognitive approach to Coherence Relations (Sanders, Spooren, \& Noordman, 1992) was originally proposed as a set of cognitively plausible primitives to order coherence relations, but is also increasingly used as a discourse annotation scheme. This paper provides an overview of new CCR distinctions that have been proposed over the years, summarizes the most important discussions about the operationalization of the primitives, and introduces a new distinction (disjunction) to the taxonomy to improve the descriptive adequacy of CCR. In addition, it reflects on the use of the CCR as an annotation scheme in practice. The overall aim of the paper is to provide an overview of state-of-the-art CCR for discourse annotation that can form, together with the original 1992 proposal, a comprehensive starting point for anyone interested in annotating discourse using CCR.},
 author = {Jet Hoek and Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul and Ted J. M. Sanders},
 day = {18},
 doi = {10.5087/dad.2019.201},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {Dialogue \& Discourse},
 month = {10},
 pages = {1--33},
 title = {Using the Cognitive Approach to Coherence Relations for Discourse Annotation},
 url = {https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/dad/article/view/10739},
 volume = {10},
 year = {2019}
}
