@article{Hardt-2013.203,
 abstract = {I present arguments in favor of the Uniformity Hypothesis: the hypothesis that discourse can extend syntax dependencies without conflicting with them. I consider arguments that Uniformity is violated in certain cases involving quotation, and I argue that the cases presented in the literature are in fact completely consistent with Uniformity. I report on an analysis of all examples in the Copenhagen Dependency Treebanks involving violations of Uniformity. I argue that they are in fact all consistent with Uniformity, and conclude that the CDT should be revised to reflect this.},
 author = {Daniel Hardt},
 day = {19},
 doi = {10.5087/dad.2013.203},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {Dialogue \& Discourse},
 month = {04},
 pages = {53--64},
 title = {A Uniform Syntax and Discourse Structure: the Copenhagen Dependency Treebanks},
 url = {https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/dad/article/view/10767},
 volume = {4},
 year = {2013}
}
